MicroPakistan

WOW!!! Read this! Shameful! What is this government upto???? This is the first time we’ve heard from the Chief Justice and I’m certain this is not the last. As anticipated the first argument he has put forward is that the SJC members must be disqualified since he does not expect a fair inquiry. Please read it.

Non functional CJP Chaudhry Iftikhar Mohammad email’s to Ather Minallah Advocate

Before the Supreme Judicial Council

(Constituted against the provisions of article 209 of the constitution of the Islamic Republic of
Pakistan).

Reference: no: 43 of /209
(Application for obtaining copies of documents/evidence and raising objection on the
constitutionality of SJC).

Above noted reference came up for hearing on march 9th,2007 after 6:00 pm in a indecent haste as it is evident from a news published in daily Naw-i-waqt dated March 10th, 2007 where it has been published that, chief justices, of Lahore and Karachi were brought to Islamabad in a special flight (copy of News item is appended as annex-A) The SJC on having gone through record passed on order detrimental against my interest and against the interest of institution whereby I have been restrained to work as Supreme Court judge and chief justice of Pakistan. Such powers are not available at all to a facts finding inquiry commission / council as such powers are available to courts and can be derived only from the constitutional provisions and the law.

In my understanding and as per the interpretation of the constitution under article 209 no such powers are available to the council as it is not exercising the power of the court. So that as it may by passing restrained order by the council as well as the earlier order notified in notification no 529/(2)/2007 issued by the president of Pakistan which is equally contrary to the constitution I have suffered as under:

(A) Detained for all intend and purpose with my family members including my infant child of 7 years from the evening of March 9th, 2007 uptill now. My official residence is sealed with heavy continget comprising police and member of other agencies. For which there is no justification.

(B) The vehicles which were in my use have been taken away by means of a lifter out of which one has been brought back by a lifter without its keys.

(c) Staff of Supreme Court attached with me is reportedly missing and had been kept at an unknown place. I believe that they have been detained just to fabricate evidence against me. I have also learned reliably that my chamber was also sealed and reportedly files lying there have been removed and some of them had been handedover to ISI under the supervision of newly appointed registrar. Such act is contrary to all norms and practices. I being CJP is entitled to occupy my chamber along with my staff.

(D) On account of deployment of heavy contingencies I am not allowed to go outside nor my family members are allowed to do so. Similarly no one is allowed to meet me freely. In as my colleagues have no access to me and whenever they want to visit they have to wait on the gate for a considerable period during which permission is sought from high ups of Mr Justice Raja Fayyaz can be quoted as on one occasion he had to go back without meeting me. Similar treatment was offered to Mr Justice Munir A sheikh (Retd).

(E) My children are not allowed to go to school, college and university I am not getting facility of telephone cable and DSL. Similarly I along with my family members have been deprived from basic amenities of Life ie medicines and doctor etc. (F) No. panel of lawyers is available to discuss the legal and factual issues involved in this reference. This act I have already highlighted on the notice received on March 10th, 2007.

By noting the above agonies which are being suffered by me I do not want to seek any relief from the council except that an unconstitutional order dated march 9th, 2007 passed by the council has persuaded me to show distrust on the formation of the council because the manner in which I have been dealt with. I do not expect a fair inquiry particularly for the following, reasons with reference to the chairman and 2 other members.

Justice Javed Iqbal.

He has been appointed as acting Chief justice contrary to article 180 of the constitution of Islamic republic of Pakistan which provided that acting Chief justice can be appointed when the office of the Chief Justice of Pakistan is vacant or the Chief Justice of Pakistan is absent or is unable to perform the functions of his office due to any other cause. The cause could be that if the Chief Justice is incapable of properly performing the duties of his office by a reason of physical or mental incapacity which is not the case over here. Therefore he should not have taken oath of the office of the acting Chief justice not withstanding that whosoever has issued his notification.

As per the mandate of article 209 of the constitution if the reference is to be heard against the Chief Justice of Pakistan the judge of the supreme court who is next in seniority would head the council. But with out being appointed as acting Chief Justice.
Mr Justice Rana Bhagwendas is admitted the senior most judge therefore on account of his temporary absence from the country up to March 22nd 2007 there was no urgency to convene the meeting of SJC during night/after office hours and by ensuring presence of 2 chief justices by making arrangements by a special plane. Such actions on his part speak volumes as it has been reported in International. The News. Extract of which is appended her with as annex B.

Justice Abdul Hameed dogar
He administered oath to Justice Javed Iqbal on march 9th 2007 for the office of acting Chief Justice dis-qualifying himself to be judge of the supreme court knowing well that office of the Chief Justice is not vacant as he is not incapable to perform his duties physically or mentally.A reference/complaint it is pending against him before SJC in respect of financial misappropriation in the Shah Latif Bhatai university Khairpur along with the Vice Chancellor of the university. The reference is lying in the record of SJC which was in custody of Doctor Fakir Hussain.

Justice Iftikhar Hussain Chaudhry
More than one references of misconduct etc are pending against him before SJC. The chairman is fully aware about it as files are lying in custody for the purpose of scrutiny therefore he can not sit as a member of the council. His inclusion is based on malafides because the chairman knowing about these facts may have not notified not him as member of council. He has developed strong hostilities against me which is known to everyone on account of non accepting his recommendation of Advocates and Judicial officers for elevations as judges of Lahore High court. His elevation as the judge of the Supreme Court was opposed by me in august 2005 for very important reason, which cannot be disclosed here. However this letter is available in the record which maybe looked into and if it has been displaced/tampered as reportedly all files from my chambers have been removed. The copy of the same maybe requisitioned from concerned office.

I may point out that we are not even on talking terms with each others. He has himself disconnected all relations including the working one. He his otherwise interested in the positive result of the inquiry sent by the President on the advise of Prime Minister because one of his brother is the minister in the cabinet of prime minister and he had been expressing his views in favour of the reference and against me on television channels (reportedly).

Therefore I have serious objection on his being member of the council for the above reasons and I do not have expectations of fair inquiry from him. Thus his name should be excluded from the panel in the interest of justice and fair play. In view of above objections I am of the opinion that SJC is not duly constituted and is incapable to hold inquiry against me. Without prejudice to above I reserve my right to raise any other objection at the time of submitting my reply to charge sheet because so far no documents have been supplied to me nor I have any facility to consult panel of lawyers because no one has been allowed to accompany me, therefore I may be supplied precise oral evidence and documentary evidence.

I will be submitting a list of documents in support of my defence which shall be summoned by the SJC as I have no access.

PUBLIC INQUIRY
The contents of notice indicates camera inquiry but I am of the opinion that charges against me are not sustainable being unfounded. Therefore to vindicate my honour I would prefer for a public inquiry, so whole of the world may know the nature of allegations and my defence and I am confident that I will be exonerated of the charges if fair inquiry is allowed. As for as the rule 13 of conducting inquiry is concerned it pertains to the inquiry in respect of which a direct complaint has been received by the SJC and power are to be exercised by the council under the article 209 (5), but in my opinion for the reference received from the president of Pakistan the SJC can follow any other procedure including public inquiry.

The necessity of public inquiry is also called for because the reference is based in a letter and sprit of open letter written by Mr Neem Bokhari which has already been publicised widely. Therefore there should not be any objection/observation in holding public inquiry. As a question of my and institutions prestige is involved therefore I volunteer for open inquiry so the public of this country my have more respect and confidence in the institution of the higher judiciary. Thus for the above reasons the council my be reconstituted accordingly excluding the members in respect of whom objections have been removed here and above and to negate the impression nationwide and to save the country’s image internationally that this is one sided biased dummy and
command performance.

The copies of requisite document be supplied to me along with the copy of the rules of SJC. A panel of the lawyers ready to defend me and the judicial system of this nation is present outside the court building since they are not being allowed to enter in the court premises against all norms and ethics as well as the principle of access to justice and justice for all. Therefore lawyers should be allowed inside to argue these objections because the building of the Supreme Court belongs to bench and bar both.

At the end I say that the order dated March 9th, 2007 restraining me from functioning as the judge of the Supreme Court and the Chief Justice of Pakistan be recalled being contrary to the provision of the constitution.

Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry
(Chief justice Islamic Republic of Pakistan)